Land Ho’

Disgusted and infuriated by the way our alleged stewards of the land have savaged Florida’s environment, Hometown Democracy has sponsored  Amendment 4, which, in their words,

“will give voters oversight control over how their community will grow and evolve, by requiring that those changes to your local master plan for future land development  (comprehensive plan) that are approved by your city or county commission must then go to the voters for final approval or rejection in a referendum.

Writing in Saturday’s Miami Hurled, John Koenig of floridathinks.com doesn’t much care for the underlying premise on which this amendment is based:

But Hometown Democracy also invites a much broader question, one that bores into the very structure of government established by our nation’s founders more than 200 years ago. If we can no longer trust our elected representatives to make decisions in the public interest on land-use matters, what issues dare we trust them with?

He goes on to cite historical precedent for hedges the Founders worked into the Constitution, such as indirect votes for the US Senate, the Electoral College, etc., and notes:

Our forefathers created this structure because, quite frankly, they feared that total democracy would deteriorate into mindless mob rule.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present you with as plain and clear a statement of elitist garbage as you will ever encounter, sufficient to cause Ben Franklin to upchuck all over his snowbound Philadelphia grave.

If there is just one proposition the Founders, to a man, accepted without reservation, it is that elected officials  are NOT to be trusted, and require constant vigilance by the electorate.  Unlike Koenig, they were worldly individuals who knew firsthand the dangers of power in the hands of the petty.  Hence the Constitution’s elaborate system of checks and balances.  Hence the private writings of the Founders to one another, seeking the balance between governors and the governed.

By their actions, the thieves, clods, and greedheads whose policies have raped Florida’s environment have performed an admirable service: they have made an airtight case against their own competence to care for the land responsibly.  In this matter, not only it is the prerogative of the people to strip them of power, it is our obligation.  I believe you will find the philosophical outlines for this position not in the US Constitution, but the Declaration of Independence, which preceded it.

Koenig’s argument that runs, “But if we do it in this particular matter, what keeps us from doing it every time?” is so dumb it drools and wears a pointed cap.  He invokes the wrong principle here.  We do it this one time because it’s needed, not for the helluvit, and it may or not be appropriate in another context.  We don’t strip the powers of Legislatures or Commissions for no reason, only when those bodies have demonstrated their corrupt incompetence, as they clearly have done in the matter of land usage.  The proper precedent is not to enforce a mechanical system, but to look to the results of that system’s actions.

This isn’t “mob rule,” Koenig.  Don’t you live here?  Haven’t you got eyes in your head?  This is the citizenry appalled at the heinous conduct of corrupt leadership held hostage by greedy interests whose allegiance lies outside the welfare of the governed and the land we occupy.  Amendment 4 is the reaction to a system gone bad, not a rejection of the system itself.

“Mob rule” might even be an improvement.

This entry was posted in News From the Nation's Dicktip. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Land Ho’

  1. Missing Lincoln says:

    But Amendment 4 is like taking the potty away from the child because he is using it as a drum. Meanwhile, the kid is still crapping on the floor. And we’re cleaning it up, because the kid only knows how to crap on the floor. Somebody has to make this kid sit on his poop. Sure, it’ll seem like fun for a while, but its gonna leave a nasty rash.

  2. The founding fathers thought the “people” were absolutely incapable of running the country which is why they put in all that crapola…..indirect appointment of Senators, the electoral college, etc.

    A little known fact of American History is that it is now plainly shown that they were thinking about Flori-DUH the whole .Do you think the people can make things work directly . Go to a condo board association meeting anywhere in Boca next week and let me know.

  3. Ghost of Miami Contractor says:

    …back in the 70’s we didn’t have to deal with any of this crappola. We just cleared land and trees and spread that concrete. Man, I love concrete. Zoning? Who cares? Green? Only green that matters is CASH. Shade? Get an umbrella. You people just don’t get it. Concrete. That’s the future.

  4. Beardsley says:

    His argument isn’t as worthless as it is disingenuous. Invoking the Founders’ intention is ludicrous under the best of circumstances, in a local issue of this nature, it’s so out of whack I’m inclined to believe he’s fronting for somebody, like a doctor with a pharmacuetical contract.

    Referendums are put to citizens all the time. Often they’re wrong-headed and mean-spirited, often they’re genuinely grass-roots in nature and populist in outcome. They’re a perfectly respectful approach to effecting change. Judge this one on its merits, not some cooked-up screed like this one.

    Good post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s