The Real Richards

Maybe you heard that the City of Hollywood and Douglas Hewett, the new city manager on the job just 14 weeks, have parted company.  [Via Miami Hurled]

Police pulled Hewett over and handed him a DUI on Easter Sunday at about 3 am.  He had just left Swinging Richards, a gay strip club in North Miami Beach.  “I was in a hurry to get home and paint my eggs,” he allegedly told police.  (No he didn’t.  But maybe he should have.)

Hewett promptly informed the mayor and commission, who initially had his back. “I was never worried about the DUI,’’ said Commissioner Dick Blattner. “That happens. Shame on you. Pay your fine. Do your intervention or whatever the courts order. That’s a matter for the judicial system.’’

Then something changed.

But in late May, news of Hewett’s arrest became public, and reporters revealed details Hewett had not told the commissioners….“We did not know where his drinking had taken place,” said Blattner. “We didn’t know what it was. I saw the name [Swinging Richards] in the police report, but that name meant nothing to me.”

What details?  The way this is written it appears as though the problem is that Swinging Richards is a gay club.  And then there’s this:

During a special meeting Friday,[Mayor Peter] Bober said his decision to ask for Hewett’s resignation was not based on the DUI itself, but how he handled it afterward….“If you want to claim you are being forthcoming and being straight,” said Bober. “I think you have to come forward with all the details.”

Again, I’m lost: what details?  How did he mishandle it?  And I’m a little concerned about Bober’s choice of the word “straight.”

Finally, there’s this:

Bober was also concerned about Hewett’s personal Twitter account that has since been removed. A Google search for his account — NC_Pimpernel — includes Hewett’s description of himself as an “uncivil civil servant.”

Bee eff dee.  In any case, what I see here is a minor infraction (to which Hewett entered a not-guilty plea) and some adolescent social media behavior. It speaks to neither his credentials nor his professional judgment. It will, however, cost the city a lot of money while buying: nothing.

He had the good sense to party elsewhere than his own city, but not enough to get somebody else to drive. That’s about it.

Nor do I see where he covered anything up. He called his employers and informed them of the episode. What details did he allegedly leave out that upset commissioners? And I don’t understand why it makes a difference, as I guess Blattner indicates, that he was drinking in a gay club.

The problem here is deeper than this single incident and the commissioners’ reaction.  Underlying the whole scenario is the insulation these elected officials erect and in which they (mal)function. They’re not smarter or more hard-working than the rest of us, despite their claims to the contrary, and what they do is no more difficult than what private sector workers do every damn hour of every damn day.

But they make it harder for themselves.  There are egos to stroke, useless procedures to circumvent, and posturing for self-promotional purposes that eat up a lot of time and energy.  The rabbit on about reputation, integrity, appearances, etc., completely clueless that in so doing they’re their own worst enemies.  With this high-profile farcical display of prudish puffery they’ve done it again.

Meanwhile Hollywood residents are stuck with the bill and a void in the executive suite. Talk about poor judgment.

This entry was posted in News From the Nation's Dicktip. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Real Richards

  1. Diesel Fitter says:

    Ha ha. “Dick” Blattner.
    Hey, one bad joke deserves another.

  2. Mister E says:

    It’s especially hypocritical when you think about how long they kept that CRA director on the payroll who was notorious for carousing around town drunk and grabbing men’s crotches. Guess maybe this guy grabbed the wrong one?

  3. julesagray says:

    You know, when I used to go out & get plastered at gay bars, I ALWAYS ALWAYS grabbed the correct crotch. Fuckin’ amateurs.

  4. Merkin Way says:

    Here’s the way I read this: You hate everything about government and the people who do it, but what you hate most is when they try to do something to elevate their own professionalism and integrity. That’s because you’d rather have the opportunity to point at a flawed individual from time to time to prove your point at what heels they are than a genuinely professional and efficient work force, because that would prove you wrong about government. Do I have that right? .

    • Squathole says:

      Merkin, if I were that clever and devious I’d have a whole lot more money. Besides, you’re living in fantasy land if you think any municipal government strives to be “genuinely professional and efficient.” That just isn’t why people go into government, and you don’t achieve professionalism and efficiency by accident.

      I have a lot more to say about this — and I bet you do, too. I know that after a long career forced to lick ass and pay off inspectors, you don’t like government any more than I do. Please tune in later this week.

  5. Pingback: Swinging Richards, Part 2 | Obalesque

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s